Here is a link to our Math - Art Project
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JPwtfn_BX-FqC5VVc9jGBdT3OuA1om4EBGh2FOwiLlQ/edit#slide=id.g9b5c589a29_0_21
Here is a link to our Math - Art Project
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JPwtfn_BX-FqC5VVc9jGBdT3OuA1om4EBGh2FOwiLlQ/edit#slide=id.g9b5c589a29_0_21
In the article, Pape and Tchoshanov (2001) argue that internal and external representations should be utilized to develop student's understanding of mathematics (p.118). They define internal representation as "abstractions of mathematical ideas or cognitive schemata that are developed by a learner through experience." (p.119). These are the mental images that learners have in mind, and draw relation to personal experiences. External manifestations of mathematical concepts can be represented by visuals such as graphs, tables, diagrams and charts. External representations also include numerals, and algebraic equation. I believe visual representations of mathematical concepts would be helpful for students in understanding the mathematical concepts. They give a clearer sense as to what the content is, and they make math problems less dull. Visual representations also make concepts notable and deepen the memory in the learners minds because I often find students pay more attention to visuals than just plain words.
Verbal representation was shown in Figure 1 on page 119 in the article, but the authors do not provide an example for how it works. In verbal representation, students use words to relate math symbols and ideas. This type of representation can be useful in word problems by deciphering the given information and what is being asked to find.
Example of how the verbal model works can be found in this link.
https://www.target.k12.mt.us/cms/lib7/MT01000812/Centricity/Domain/68/math_iwthout_numbers.pdf
My favorite math teacher was my grade 12 math teacher. I thought she was really smart because she has a dual degree in English and mathematics. She was not only the head of the math department at our school, but she was also one of the MYP coordinators. I really liked her because her way of teaching was very organized. She explained everything thoroughly, and I understood everything she was presenting in class. The amount of homework load she assigned was just about right, and the tests were fairly designed. I have developed my interest for math in her class and I look up to her as a role model for the type of math teacher I want to become.
My least favorite math teacher was my instructor for a second year university course. Maybe it was his first time teaching that course, my classmates and I felt like he didn't how to teach. We felt like the assignments we had to do had no relation to what was taught in class. I felt puzzled throughout that course and now when I look back, I can't remember what I have learned exactly. I only remember we were asked to do assignments using python and latex, but I never learned any of that in previous courses nor in that particular class. I felt like I had no idea what was going on in that class and I had a time passing that course.
When I was reading the first page of this article, I thought I was reading some article on language learning because it starts by talking about the French word Faux Amis. It made me pause for a little, and I went back to check whether this was the reading for one of my math-related classes. I stopped again when Skemp introduces the concepts of "relational understanding" and "instrumental understanding". I always thought "understanding" is just "understanding“ and I did not know that it separates into two different concepts. After reading Skemp's article, I now have a little more understanding on the two types of understanding, and I believe the type of understanding have is instrumental. Later when Skemp went on to talk about applying relational and instrumental in teaching mathematics. I paused to wonder which method should math teachers use? Although Skemp concluded that teachers should "make a reasoned choice" depending on the situation (p.11), I believe most teachers would choose instrumental mathematics over relational mathematics. If we are talking about students in elementary to high school, I would prefer instrumental mathematics because students would have to assessed through tests and exams in order to advance to the next level. Both students and teachers may not want to make the effort to discuss the content behind relational mathematics. I believe relational mathematics would be more applicable to students in the post-secondary level
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AppI1LhbnlHimjtbRxiRgQDj3j7DPH6j EDCP 342A Unit planning: Rationale and overview for planning a uni...